appleguy123
May 5, 07:15 PM
BTO=build to order
potdog
May 5, 12:56 PM
Got my iphone 4 2 weeks ago, everything running perfectly until tonight. While i was listening to a podcast on speakers it suddenly went silent then a few seconds later went back to normal again. Now, the speakers is just intermittently working.
-audio okay using headset
-jailbroken
any ideas? im thinking it has something to do with the hardware, i tried restarting and it still doesn't work.
thanks!
-audio okay using headset
-jailbroken
any ideas? im thinking it has something to do with the hardware, i tried restarting and it still doesn't work.
thanks!
livingfortoday
Dec 9, 11:07 PM
I need an iPod mini. The last one I had met with... an unfortunate "accident".
Doesn't particularly matter to me which gen it is, as long as it holds a decent charge (4 hours or more), and isn't pink. Well, I'll settle for pink, but at a discount.
PM me!
Doesn't particularly matter to me which gen it is, as long as it holds a decent charge (4 hours or more), and isn't pink. Well, I'll settle for pink, but at a discount.
PM me!
mrsir2009
Apr 28, 07:33 PM
Apple should really diversify their suppliers anyway, which is what they look like they are doing. Cut Samsung supply by 50%, and threaten all of it if they don't get their act together. Surely Samsung doesn't think that that they can bring in this kind of revenue on their own merit. Outside of LCD televisions, Samsung has an image problem, and even that has only improved in the last few years.
Samsung makes good cellphones. All the cellphones I've owned in my life have been Samsung ones :D
Samsung makes good cellphones. All the cellphones I've owned in my life have been Samsung ones :D
more...
DeathChill
Apr 22, 11:41 PM
Here we go:
http://oleb.net/blog/2010/04/universal-app-is-not-a-universal-binary/
The iPhone can run iPad apps as a universal app contains a single application binary with appropriate resolution and UI information dependent on the device. Therefore the iPad and iPhone can run the EXACT same application binaries, so that argument is out the window.
http://oleb.net/blog/2010/04/universal-app-is-not-a-universal-binary/
The iPhone can run iPad apps as a universal app contains a single application binary with appropriate resolution and UI information dependent on the device. Therefore the iPad and iPhone can run the EXACT same application binaries, so that argument is out the window.
Casey4147
Apr 8, 08:58 AM
Yessssss! Finally! Tempest! Centipede! The original Breakout! ...Now, where's Gauntlet, and I can stop nagging!
And, somebody, PLEASE license LEMMINGS.
And, somebody, PLEASE license LEMMINGS.
more...
Corey Grandy
Sep 13, 10:39 AM
I have a problem. :)
Glial
Apr 6, 02:10 PM
So you can get a 1TB hard drive for $80.... 12,000 of those.... not that big of an expenditure tbf.
1TB Fiber Channel , 15K RPM SAS drives or SSD are much more expensive. You don't really use desktop harddrives in a SAN.
1TB Fiber Channel , 15K RPM SAS drives or SSD are much more expensive. You don't really use desktop harddrives in a SAN.
more...
darktiger
Apr 15, 08:50 AM
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5069/5583956876_9de7778cda_b.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/darktiger/5583956876/)Hong Kong (http://www.flickr.com/photos/darktiger/5583956876/) by darktiger (http://www.flickr.com/people/darktiger/), on Flickr
reubs
Sep 11, 09:05 AM
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/118566/Sushi.png
This is weird and kind of disgusting, but I'd like to know where it came from...
Thanks!
This is weird and kind of disgusting, but I'd like to know where it came from...
Thanks!
more...
three
Sep 3, 03:52 AM
http://cl.ly/938cad8c5c14b341b31c
Alienrat
Apr 7, 10:58 AM
I wonder how many of these posts are trolls? I haven't had any issues whatsoever with 4.3.1.
Seems odd to assume that you have seen no problems there are no problems to be seen.
My battery life is good, I don't have dropped calls (mind you I never did on any phone), and most things are fine, but I get the problem in the Photos app where the camera roll gets stuck under the album bar, and you can't select it. OK, you can get round it by quiting and restarting, but if I was happy having a work round I would be using android :D
Seems odd to assume that you have seen no problems there are no problems to be seen.
My battery life is good, I don't have dropped calls (mind you I never did on any phone), and most things are fine, but I get the problem in the Photos app where the camera roll gets stuck under the album bar, and you can't select it. OK, you can get round it by quiting and restarting, but if I was happy having a work round I would be using android :D
more...
pribl
Apr 7, 08:38 AM
thanks !
Luigi239
Aug 20, 04:56 PM
For some reason I can't download a new work unit...is this happening to anybody else?
more...
kyle.booth.95
Feb 22, 02:11 AM
how can i record multiple channels from a yamaha o1v96 with midi out into my mac with garageband. And be able to mix later.
Hilmi Hamidi
Feb 21, 09:05 AM
http://i.imgur.com/GUw4Nl.jpg (http://imgur.com/GUw4N)
more...
CaptMurdock
Oct 13, 01:28 AM
Gotta go with the classics:
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y85/CaptMurdock/Screengrabs/Octoberdesktop.jpg
Original here. (http://www.fanpop.com/spots/peanuts/images/369924/title/great-pumpkin-wallpaper)
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y85/CaptMurdock/Screengrabs/Octoberdesktop.jpg
Original here. (http://www.fanpop.com/spots/peanuts/images/369924/title/great-pumpkin-wallpaper)
Apple Corps
Apr 4, 11:39 AM
It should be possible to automatically remove these kinds of flame-war-provoking-unnecessar-comments.
Bingo - IMO, this person is a detriment to our MR community - skating just on the safer side of trolling.
Bingo - IMO, this person is a detriment to our MR community - skating just on the safer side of trolling.
SpanishUser
Oct 6, 11:12 AM
I did, in fact, mean using JavaScript on page load to disable the user from changing the size of the textarea, not within my browser. It's like using CSS to disable the dotted border Firefox puts around links when they are active.
Form elements, and the divs that contain them, often need either fixed widths or have widths that are proportional to their containers.
Take Google (http://www.google.com). Depending on how the layout is set up (this is just hypothetical), resizing the search box would push those three links next to it off into oblivion if they were all in a div that was fixed or proportional to the page width. It doesn't matter if Safari "dynamically redraws the page" since the div would still be calculated to be the same. Worse yet, depending on its overflow attribute, they could be pushed onto a new line.
I'd really not like to see Safari become the next IE 5. It already has its share of JavaScript bugs. This would just mean us designers would have to spend that much more time envisioning what would happen if a user resized every form element on every page and incorporating it into our layouts. This is why I hope there's a way to disable it outright.
I hope you remember the user CSS take precedence, the user can choose a minimum font size and run an extension like nonscript to firefox so by default
no javascript would run.
The Web is based in that is the reader the one that decide how a page would look if you do not like that begin to design magazines or book.
Note: the noscript funcinality is something I would like to see added to safari.
Form elements, and the divs that contain them, often need either fixed widths or have widths that are proportional to their containers.
Take Google (http://www.google.com). Depending on how the layout is set up (this is just hypothetical), resizing the search box would push those three links next to it off into oblivion if they were all in a div that was fixed or proportional to the page width. It doesn't matter if Safari "dynamically redraws the page" since the div would still be calculated to be the same. Worse yet, depending on its overflow attribute, they could be pushed onto a new line.
I'd really not like to see Safari become the next IE 5. It already has its share of JavaScript bugs. This would just mean us designers would have to spend that much more time envisioning what would happen if a user resized every form element on every page and incorporating it into our layouts. This is why I hope there's a way to disable it outright.
I hope you remember the user CSS take precedence, the user can choose a minimum font size and run an extension like nonscript to firefox so by default
no javascript would run.
The Web is based in that is the reader the one that decide how a page would look if you do not like that begin to design magazines or book.
Note: the noscript funcinality is something I would like to see added to safari.
robbieduncan
Jan 15, 09:04 AM
Please see this thread (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=414422). There is no need for another one (this one).
eawmp1
May 2, 09:43 PM
pictures necessary? will we see their penises when they donate sperm
what a horrid picture on the front!
Would you prefer this:
http://forums.macrumors.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=280885&d=1302575577
what a horrid picture on the front!
Would you prefer this:
http://forums.macrumors.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=280885&d=1302575577
kdarling
Apr 27, 04:36 PM
We’re an engineering-driven company. When people accuse us of things, the first thing we want to do is find out the truth. That took a certain amount of time to track all of these things down. And the accusations were coming day by day. By the time we had figured this all out, it took a few days.
As someone who has to track down things like this constantly, I'm pretty unimpressed at the (lack of) speed of their code checking. This was not an obscure bug or complicated. It was just a too-large buffer definition and an execution path that always downloaded info.
And people think Apple can check binary app store submissions for bugs or trojans in just a few minutes, when they can't even find their own bugs in a few days with commented source code.
Then writing it up and trying to make it intelligible when this is a very high-tech topic took a few days.
Again unimpressed. There've been accurate explanations posted here before Apple spoke up, that took just minutes to compose.
And here we are less than a week later.
Although I've defended Apple over and over again on this topic, this just smacks of hoping it would blow over.
The right thing to do would've been to immediately say a week ago, "we're looking into it".
As someone who has to track down things like this constantly, I'm pretty unimpressed at the (lack of) speed of their code checking. This was not an obscure bug or complicated. It was just a too-large buffer definition and an execution path that always downloaded info.
And people think Apple can check binary app store submissions for bugs or trojans in just a few minutes, when they can't even find their own bugs in a few days with commented source code.
Then writing it up and trying to make it intelligible when this is a very high-tech topic took a few days.
Again unimpressed. There've been accurate explanations posted here before Apple spoke up, that took just minutes to compose.
And here we are less than a week later.
Although I've defended Apple over and over again on this topic, this just smacks of hoping it would blow over.
The right thing to do would've been to immediately say a week ago, "we're looking into it".
Ann P
Dec 9, 04:20 PM
link to orginal pls
Here you go: http://mrfolder.deviantart.com/#/d33xg1w
Here you go: http://mrfolder.deviantart.com/#/d33xg1w
WillJS
Apr 3, 11:49 AM
http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t150/analogheretic/Picture1-3.png?t=1301795011
Nice, link? Here's mine:
http://i.imgur.com/aXrRs.jpg
Nice, link? Here's mine:
http://i.imgur.com/aXrRs.jpg