REQUIRE_GC
06-22 01:45 AM
I have just received an email from CRIS that my I 140 has been approved.Good luck to everybody.
Country: India
EB2
PD: Dec 2005
1st I 140 approval date: June 2006
Concurrent filing I 140 and I 485 applied on 6th August 2007
2nd I 140 approval date: 30th April 2008
Congrrtulations, Nagireddi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Country: India
EB2
PD: Dec 2005
1st I 140 approval date: June 2006
Concurrent filing I 140 and I 485 applied on 6th August 2007
2nd I 140 approval date: 30th April 2008
Congrrtulations, Nagireddi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
wallpaper Little Boy Mohawk Hairstyle
missedthecut
06-16 09:37 PM
Hi Friends,
I have been cheated by a desi consulting company e-Data experts located in Harrisburg, PA. They applied for my labor in December of 2007 and it was audited and finally I was told in June 2010 that it was denied. Actually it was denied in January 2010 but they did not reveal this information intentionally. Now I am in my 6th year of my H1b which expires in March 2011. Can someone help me out how to sue the company for not revealing the information and firstly how can I stay in the country. BTW I have done Masters here and I am with another company now. Appreciate all your suggestions.
Thanks,
RK
I have been cheated by a desi consulting company e-Data experts located in Harrisburg, PA. They applied for my labor in December of 2007 and it was audited and finally I was told in June 2010 that it was denied. Actually it was denied in January 2010 but they did not reveal this information intentionally. Now I am in my 6th year of my H1b which expires in March 2011. Can someone help me out how to sue the company for not revealing the information and firstly how can I stay in the country. BTW I have done Masters here and I am with another company now. Appreciate all your suggestions.
Thanks,
RK
chanduy9
07-05 08:50 AM
send flowers...it is much more than rally...
2011 cool short haircuts. Tags
plakshmi
09-24 10:07 AM
I filed my 485 in August 2008 with new fee structure (one time fee for AP and EAD renewals). Now my AP is expiring in November 2009. Can any one who applied for AP renewal under the one time fee structure let me know how do I make use of that fee. I mean.. Can i just skip sending the check for $305?
more...
xlr8r
06-22 04:15 PM
I had my tests done on Monday, X-Ray on Wednesday and my paperwork is ready today (Friday). All in all, it took about a week. Don't know about other doctors....this is in Milwaukee, WI.
nitinms
06-22 03:30 PM
Can people post experiences on turnaround time for getting medical test documents back from the doctor? I have heard 2-3 days after initial appointment, but the doctor's offices I have called say 7-10 business days. Also, I have heard that some doctor's are faster than others. Is this true?
I am interested in particular regarding
# Dr. Donna Diziki, U.S. Healthworks
16 Ethel Road, Edison, NJ 08817
(732) 248-0088
# Dr. Gita Dalal, U.S. Healthworks
16 Ethel Road, Edison, NJ 08817
(732) 248-0088
I am interested in particular regarding
# Dr. Donna Diziki, U.S. Healthworks
16 Ethel Road, Edison, NJ 08817
(732) 248-0088
# Dr. Gita Dalal, U.S. Healthworks
16 Ethel Road, Edison, NJ 08817
(732) 248-0088
more...
Blog Feeds
05-26 11:20 AM
The Supreme Court issued its decision in the Arizona business license/e-Verification law of 2007 and by a 5-3 margin has upheld the law. This is the law that allows the state to revoke business licenses for firms knowingly hiring unauthorized workers and also mandating all employers use E-Verify. This was always going to be an easier case for Arizona than the defense of its 2010 law. For one, the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 which created the employer sanctions system, says that while states may not impose civil and criminal penalties on employers hiring unauthorized workers, it does...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/supreme-court-upholds-state-business-license-e-verify-sanctions-laws.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/05/supreme-court-upholds-state-business-license-e-verify-sanctions-laws.html)
2010 His spiky messy short crop
wandmaker
01-02 02:38 PM
My AP approvals are lost in mail, my employer mailed them in ordinary mail during holiday season (12/11/07). What can I do next? Go thru attorney for duplicates? Please advice.
USCIS will not issue duplicates for AP, you will have to re-apply with a fee.
USCIS will not issue duplicates for AP, you will have to re-apply with a fee.
more...
Macaca
07-29 06:03 PM
Bet on India (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/28/AR2007072800999.html) The Bush administration presses forward with a nuclear agreement -- and hopes for a strategic partnership. July 29, 2007
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
IN LARGE PART, modern U.S. nuclear nonproliferation policy began with India. India received U.S. aid under the "Atoms for Peace" program of the early Cold War era -- only to lose its U.S. fuel supply because India, which had refused to sign the 1968 nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), exploded a nuclear "device" in 1974. Decades of U.S. noncooperation with India's civilian atomic energy program were intended to teach India, and the world, a lesson: You will not prosper if you go nuclear outside the system of international safeguards.
Friday marked another step toward the end of that policy -- also with India. The Bush administration and New Delhi announced the principles by which the United States will resume sales of civilian nuclear fuel and technology to India, as promised by President Bush in July 2005. The fine print of the agreement, which must still be approved by the 45-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group and by Congress, has not yet been released. But the big picture is clear: The administration is betting that the benefits to the United States and the world of a "strategic partnership" with India outweigh the risks of a giant exception to the old rules of the nonproliferation game.
There are good reasons to make the bet. India is a booming democracy of more than 1 billion people, clearly destined to play a growing role on the world stage. It can help the United States as a trading partner and as a strategic counterweight to China and Islamic extremists. If India uses more nuclear energy, it will emit less greenhouse gas. Perhaps most important, India has developed its own nuclear arsenal without selling materials or know-how to other potentially dangerous states. This is more than can be said for Pakistan, home of the notorious A.Q. Khan nuclear network.
You can call this a double standard, as some of the agreement's critics do: one set of rules for countries we like, another for those we don't. Or you can call it realism: The agreement provides for more international supervision of India's nuclear fuel cycle than there would be without it. For example, it allows India to reprocess atomic fuel but at a new facility under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision, to protect against its diversion into weapons. The case for admitting India to the nuclear club is based on the plausible notion that the political character of a nuclear-armed state can be as important, or more important, than its signature on the NPT. North Korea, a Stalinist dictatorship, went nuclear while a member of the NPT; the Islamic Republic of Iran appears headed down the same road. Yet India's democratic system and its manifest interest in joining the global free-market economy suggest that it will behave responsibly.
Or so it must be hoped. The few details of the agreement released Friday suggest that it is very favorable to India indeed, while skating close to the edge of U.S. law. For example, the United States committed to helping India accumulate a nuclear fuel stockpile, thus insulating New Delhi against the threat, provided for by U.S. law, of a supply cutoff in the unlikely event that India resumes weapons testing. Congress is also asking appropriate questions about India's military-to-military contacts with Iran and about New Delhi's stubborn habit of attending meetings of "non-aligned" countries at which Cuba, Venezuela and others bash the United States. As Congress considers this deal, India might well focus on what it can do to show that it, too, thinks of the new strategic partnership with Washington as a two-way street.
hair Photo of Spiky Hairstyles
same_old_guy
11-27 10:50 PM
Those salaries seem too high.
more...
gabriel_vieira
10-17 02:46 PM
i every one!!!
i have a question:
when i import the swf from swift 3d the backgrounf that i use in swift shows up in rhe swf, i want is,i export the swf whitout thr backgrund only the object!!!
thaknks!!1
i have a question:
when i import the swf from swift 3d the backgrounf that i use in swift shows up in rhe swf, i want is,i export the swf whitout thr backgrund only the object!!!
thaknks!!1
hot Spiky Blonde
Dhundhun
10-13 10:14 PM
Can students with post completion EAD work for more than one employer at the same time in their own speciality area? I mean to ask, can they work full time with one and part time with other?
My son just got his EAD for post completion OPT.
My son just got his EAD for post completion OPT.
more...
house Mohawk amp; Faux Hawk Hairstyles
krchandra
08-01 10:37 AM
Thank you for your reply. do i need to attach any report to my 485 application?
Thanks
Thanks
tattoo Asian Spiky Hairstyle 2010
smahwal
08-05 05:57 PM
We got an approval and CPO email on my husbands (primaries) application. Nothing on mine yet but I would not be surprised if both come together. PD Dec 2005 RD July 2 2007
more...
pictures oys spiky hairstyles.
DrW00t
07-16 07:55 AM
If its possible, could you list as many sites you have found as possible?
THANKYOU,
Drew
THANKYOU,
Drew
dresses Spring Short Spiky Hairstyle
newuser
08-13 10:46 AM
^^
more...
makeup 2011 cool oy hairstyles boys
Blog Feeds
06-24 01:10 AM
From Public Policy Polling: Our poll of the Texas Governor's race this week is another data point indicating possible backlash for Republican candidates this fall in the wake of the Arizona immigration law. When we polled the race in Februrary Rick Perry led Bill White by 6 points. The race is tied now, and the movement since the previous poll has come completely with Hispanic voters. With white voters Perry led 54-35 then and leads 55-35 now. With black voters White led 81-12 then and leads 70-7 now. But with Hispanics Perry has gone from leading 53-41 in February to...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/06/arizona-law-could-cost-gop-texas-governors-race.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/06/arizona-law-could-cost-gop-texas-governors-race.html)
girlfriend Great Spiky Hairstyles For Men
creativeFuzion
08-02 09:32 PM
bobbo, great job man! I love the pig one! Haha, is that ex President Clinton I see there? Lol, good job, I love 'em all!
~Philip
~Philip
hairstyles with short spiky hairstyle
supercomp
01-29 10:52 PM
My uncle just received his L1 extension receipt. Lawyer was late in filing the L1 extension, but supposedly got everything ready and mailed it 2 days before the L1 expiration date.
However, my uncle received recepit for L1 extension, and received date is 2 weeks after the expiration of original L1. Please note I am talking about RECEIVED DATE (not Notice date or receipt date).
Does this mean extension will automatically get rejected based on late filing? Is there any recourse to this?
More importantly, Is my uncle Out of Status now? (He doesn't have anything else going besides L1)
Please let me know as soon as possible.
However, my uncle received recepit for L1 extension, and received date is 2 weeks after the expiration of original L1. Please note I am talking about RECEIVED DATE (not Notice date or receipt date).
Does this mean extension will automatically get rejected based on late filing? Is there any recourse to this?
More importantly, Is my uncle Out of Status now? (He doesn't have anything else going besides L1)
Please let me know as soon as possible.
raysaikat
02-13 03:56 AM
I have a gc. Can I sponsor my parents for GC ?
Thanks,
theOne
AFAIK, you will need to have citizenship.
Thanks,
theOne
AFAIK, you will need to have citizenship.
Blog Feeds
01-18 09:00 AM
Here's an article I co-wrote for Bloomberg on I-9 and E-Verify issues facing health care employers. Not so much political as practical, but for those readers in health care or who advise health care clients, it may be helpful. Employment Eligibility Immigration Compliance: Managing I-9 and E-Verify Risk in the Healthcare Industry -
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/immigration-employment-compliance-and-the-health-care-industry.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2011/01/immigration-employment-compliance-and-the-health-care-industry.html)